Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angelus Foundation (2nd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗plicit 14:12, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
AfDs for this article:
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Angelus Foundation (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Created by a single purpose editor. The references are either primary or mostly small one line mentions in mainstream press. Fails WP:ORG. LibStar (talk) 04:47, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and England. LibStar (talk) 04:47, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 06:43, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with the nomination. MaskedSinger (talk) 07:07, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 05:08, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: per the nomination. My search didn't bring up anything useful to show notability. TarnishedPathtalk 13:56, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.