This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pharmacology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pharmacology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PharmacologyWikipedia:WikiProject PharmacologyTemplate:WikiProject Pharmacologypharmacology
The Pong ref was not in any format originally. I wrapped it and set the style there. While you are correct on reverting the other articles, this one you are incorrect. - UtherSRG(talk)21:33, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@UtherSRG: You are conflating templating with formatting. The Pong reference was not templated, but the authors were clearly formatted in Vancouver style, which I have restored. Maintaining consistent citation formatting is not anti-CITEVAR as long as it adheres to the originally established style. Boghog (talk) 22:02, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
